DELIVERABLES

Deliverables will be made available here for download once they have been accepted by the European Commission.

WP1: Stakeholder Dialog and Project Co-Design

D1.1 Stakeholder community (Report available)

🗎Identification and enrollment of stakeholders (Lead Partner: HELCOM)

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Methodology
    1. Stakeholder community: Groups & Expectations
    2. Stakeholder engagement approach
    3. Stakeholder personal data protection
  3. Results
    1. Current roster of stakeholders, February 2026
  4. Discussion
  5. Conclusions
  6. Supplementary material
D1.2 Identified needs (Report available)

🗎First needs and requirements for stakeholders are identified (Lead Partner: AU)

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Materials and Methods
    1. Survey Area
    2. Stakeholders Identification and Selection
    3. Survey Design
    4. Data Collection and Analysis
  3. Results
    1. Profile of respondents
    2. Impacts of dumped marine munitions on the environment, economy, security and safety
    3. Remediation of submerged munitions
      1. Aspects requiring further information
      2. Impacts of remediation on the Environment, Economy and Security
      3. Need for remediation actions
      4. Remediation approaches and methods
  4. Discussion
  5. Conclusions
  6. References
  7. Appendices
    1. Questionnaire
    2. Concerns of the Presence of Munitions in the Sea
    3. Additional Information for Remediation
    4. Other Considerations for Remediation Activities
    5. Methods for Remediation
D1.3 Synthesis of findings

Synthesis report of stakeholder discussion outcomes (Lead Partner: HELCOM)


WP2: Responsibilities, assessment and decision-making

D2.1 Responsibilities

Synthesis report on responsibilities(Lead Partner: HELCOM)

D2.2 Assessment of security risks

Synthesis report security(Lead Partner: BPol)

D2.3 Risk assessment & decision

Synthesis report decision making(Lead Partner: AU)


WP3: Seafloor munition detection and identification

D3.2 Optical observation & reconstruction

Final compilation of optical observations and reconstruction(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)


WP4: Subseafloor munition detection and classification

D4.1 Buried UXOs maps

Mapping of areas where burial is impossible, possible or probable(Lead Partner: SHOM)

D4.2 Magnetic inversion

Mapping of areas where burial is impossible, possible or probable(Lead Partner: VLIZ)

D4.3 Electromagnetic methods

Report on state of the art and results from real campaigns(Lead Partner: SeaTerra)

D4.4 3D-SBP strategies

Report on comparison of the different 3D-SBP strategies(Lead Partner: VLIZ)


WP5: Secure data management & automated munition detection/classification/identification

D5.1 Data Management Plan (Report available)

🗎Data Management plan of field and outreach data (Lead Partner: north.io)

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Data summary
  3. FAIR Data
    1. Making data findable, including provisions for metadata
    2. Making data accessible
    3. Making data interoperable
    4. Increase data re-use
  4. Data Security
  5. Ethical aspects
  6. Other issues
D5.4 AI approaches compiled (Report available)

🗎Landscape the existing AI approaches for munition detection (Lead Partner: RMA)

Contents

  1. Executive summary
  2. Introduction
  3. Existing AI approaches for munition detection
    1. Spatial hydroacoustic approaches
      1. Traditional and unsupervised signal processing
      2. One-stage detectors
      3. Two-stage detectors
    2. Acoustic camera approaches
    3. Optical camera approaches
  4. Conclusions
  5. References
D5.7 AI on photogrammetric data

Report on workflow for object identification in photogrammetric data(Lead Partner: CNR)

D5.8 Summary on data and AI

Final assessment of sharing data, AI approaches and models (summary of D5.4 to D5.7)(Lead Partner: RMA)


WP6: Smart and cooperative applications for autonomous and remotely controlled vehicles

D6.2 Magnetics on AUVs (Report available)

🗎Magnetic processing on AUVs based on SAM project (Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. The Magnetic Method
  3. AUVs
    1. General Remarks
    2. AUV-Based Magnetics
    3. AUV-Related Magnetic Noise
    4. Integration Examples
      1. Girona 500 AUV with Fluxgate Magnetometers
      2. NemoSens AUV with one Fluxgate Magnetometer
      3. Iver2 AUV with an Overhauser Magnetometer
      4. ROV-Based Electromagnetics
  4. Data Processing
    1. General Magnetic Processing
    2. Magnetic Processing on a Girona 500 AUV
  5. Smart AUVs
  6. Conclusions
  7. References

WP7: Munition removal by grabbing

D7.1 Mission Control

Report on software and projects; requirements of new tool architecture and functions(Lead Partner: SeaTerra)


WP8: Environmental monitoring of chemical contamination using sensor systems

D8.1 Environmental risk review (Report available)

🗎Compilation of knowledge on environmental munition contamination (MC & CWA) (Lead Partner: AU)

Contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Materials and Methods
    1. MCs
    2. CWAs
      1. Literature Search - CWAs
      2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria-CWAs
      3. Selection and Quality Assessment
      4. Extraction and Harmonisation
  3. Results
    1. Study Areas and Sample Counts
    2. Measured Environmental Concentrations of MCs and CWAs
      1. MC Concentration in Sediments
      2. MC Concentrations in Water (Dissolved and Particulate)
      3. Measured CWA Concentrations in Sediments
    3. Regulatory and Toxicity Values for MCs and CWAs
      1. MC Regulatory Relevant values
      2. MC Toxicity Values
      3. CWA Regulatory Relevant Values
      4. CWA Toxicity Values
  4. Discussion
  5. Conclusions
  6. References
D8.2 Baseline EU chemical measurements

Expand upon existing data to support risk assessment by making new measurements of MC chemical levels in EU waters(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

D8.3 Explosives analysis technologies (Report available)

🗎Review of available technologies for monitoring explosive compounds (Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

Contents

  1. Introduction
    1. The EU context
    2. Existing methods for munition search and clearance
    3. Field methods for chemical detection
  2. Critical characteristics
  3. Existing technologies
    1. Immunosensors
    2. Amplifying Fluorescent Polymers
    3. Electrochemical Detection
    4. Portable HPLC
    5. Portable mass spectrometry
    6. Preconcentration of explosives from seawater
  4. Outlook for the future
    1. GEOMAR "Xplotector" Lab-in-a-Box System
    2. Fraunhofer ICT electrochemical sensor
    3. System integration within MMinE-SwEEPER
  5. Conclusions
  6. References
D8.4 Electrochemical sensor

Electrochemical sensor advanced for integration in AUVs(Lead Partner: FHG-ICT)

D8.5 CWA analyses through NAA (Report available)

🗎Report on available technology for CWA analysis including NAA (Lead Partner: IOPAN)

Contents

  1. Introduction
    1. The environmental and security challenge of sea-dumped chemical warfare agents
    2. The EU context
    3. Operational and safety drivers for on-board CWA analysis
  2. On-board CWA analysis
    1. Hazmat-teams/CBRN-units
    2. Analysis of CWA with deployable headspace GC-MS
    3. Analysis of CWA by portable capillary electrophoresis
  3. Neutron Activation Analysis NAA
    1. Monte Carlo simulations
      1. Analysis details
      2. Simulation results
    2. Experimental results
  4. Conclusions
  5. References
D8.6 Advanced Xplotector

Xplotector system enable for shipboard CWA analysis(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

D8.7 Report on corrosion

Report on optical and ultrasonic corrosion classes & measurements(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)


WP9: Assessment of munition remediation methods

D9.1 Onsite LOD and HOD (Report available)

🗎Report of facts, impacts and costs of HOD and LOD (Lead Partner: FFI)

Contents

  1. Introduction
    1. Reactions of explosives
  2. High-order detonation (HOD)
  3. Low-order disposal (LOD)
  4. Comparing HOD and LOD
    1. Pressure wave
    2. Contamination
    3. Cost
  5. Other disposal methods
  6. Regulations and standards
  7. Conclusions and recommendations
  8. References
D9.2 Chem. cont. LOD and HOD

Simulation of chemical contamination during HOD(Lead Partner: FHG-ICT)

D9.3 Mitigation HOD

Overview of possible mitigation measures including field reports(Lead Partner: FHG-ICT)

D9.4 Effects of coverup methods

Report on munition cover-up possibilities, risks and costs(Lead Partner: FFI)

D9.5 Large amounts of munition

Large amounts of munition Summary of approaches to clear large amounts of munition(Lead Partner: FFI)

D9.6 Chemical dispersion

Model code for dispersion(Lead Partner: Cran-U)

D9.6 Chemical dispersion

Model code for dispersion(Lead Partner: Cran-U)

D9.7 Chemical contamination

Report of chemical contamination regarding BiP(Lead Partner: AU)


WP10: Tests, trials and demonstrator surveys


WP11: WP11: Integration of best practices and development of education material

D11.1 Report on Historical Data Analyses (Report available)

🗎Report on the evaluation and application of methodologies for handling historical data used for initial site screening and risk assessment (Lead Partner: KRD-SH)

Contents

  1. Introduction Historical Data
    1. Data Sources in Historical UXO Research
      1. Archival and Documentary Sources
      2. Aerial and War-Time Photographs
      3. Recovered Munitions Records
      4. Oral History and Local Knowledge
      5. Geological and Environmental Indicators
      6. Cross-Cutting Challenges in Historical Data Sources
      7. Example: Old scripts and handwriting
  2. Historical Data Compilation, Processing and Spatial Analysis
    1. Compiling and Data management
    2. Historical Data Processing and Validation
    3. GIS-based Spatial Integration
    4. KIS at the EOD Service in Schleswig-Holstein (KRD-SH)
  3. Output: Mapping of Suspected UXO Areas and Risk Assessment
    1. Automated Analysis of Historical Documents for the Identification of Dumped Munition and UXO in the Baltic and North Seas
    2. ErPaD: AI-based extraction of spatial positions from historical documents
    3. ErPaD 2.0: Transition from Research to Operational Large-Scale Deployment
    4. From Methodology to Product: Smart Geotagging within the ocean data platform TrueOcean
    5. Relevance for Marine Munition and UXO Management
  4. Conclusion
  5. References
  6. Appendix
D11.2 Detection and remediation

Compilation of munition detection and remediation techniques(Lead Partner: IOPAN)

D11.3 Environmental impact

Report with impact screening methods and tools(Lead Partner: AU)


WP12: Communication, knowledge transfer and capacity building

D12.1 Plan for diss. and exploitation (Report available)

🗎Plan for dissemination including guidelines and exploitation (Lead Partner: JPIO)

Contents

  1. Initial Remarks
  2. Introduction
  3. Definitions and Terminology
  4. Background
  5. Political commitments
  6. Stakeholder engagement
    1. External stakeholders
    2. Role of the External Stakeholder Advisory Board
  7. Target audience
  8. DEC tools and channels
    1. Project website
    2. JPI Oceans Munitions Portal
    3. Social media
    4. Newsletter
    5. Scientific publications and conference presentations
    6. Project flyers and information material
    7. Project video
    8. Field trials, cruises and demonstrations
    9. Media outreach
D12.2 Final science-policy event

Science-policy event in Brussels on project outcomes(Lead Partner: JPIO)

D12.3 Fully updated munition portal

Munition portal up to date(Lead Partner: JPIO)

D12.4 Munition portal legacy strategy

Strategic document on how to proceed beyond the project JPIO(Lead Partner: JPIO)


WP13: Project coordination & management

D13.2 Gender statistics

Statistics of gender balance in project, training conferences(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

D13.3 Project Website

First version of project webpage(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

D13.4 Project Report 1 (Report available)

🗎Project Report (Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

Contents

  1. Explanation of the work carried out and Overview of the progress
    1. Objectives
    2. Explanation of the work carried out per WP
    3. Impact
    4. Update of the plan for exploitation and dissemination of results
  2. Follow-up of recommendations and comments from previous review(s)
  3. Exploitation primarily in non-associated third countries
  4. Open science
  5. Deviations from Annex 1 and Annex 2
    1. Tasks/objectives
    2. Use of resources
  6. Annex: Compilation of Milestone Reports First Interim Reporting Period
D13.5 Project Report 2

Project Report(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)

D13.6 Project Report 3

Project Report(Lead Partner: GEOMAR)